Argumentative Essays on Whether Following Your Dreams Is Realistic: Grading The Alchemist Debate
Published on September 19th, 2026 by the GraideMind team
Few books spark a debate like The Alchemist. Some students think its message about chasing dreams is inspiring, while others find it naive. That disagreement makes it a good foundation for an argumentative essay.

The assignment sounds simple: take a side on whether following your dreams is realistic, using the novel as evidence. In practice, students slip between literary analysis and personal opinion. Your instructions and rubric need to keep both in view.
Argument writing also requires students to address other viewpoints, which many find uncomfortable. Nuance takes practice, and this topic offers plenty of it. Santiago's success is one data point, but the crystal merchant and the Englishman complicate the picture.
Grading these essays fairly means rewarding strong reasoning regardless of which side the student takes.
Keep the Standard Neutral
Make it clear that no position earns a better grade. A student who argues that the book's advice is unrealistic can score as high as one who defends it. Say this out loud and put it in the rubric to avoid any sense of bias.
- Claim: takes a clear, debatable position on the question
- Evidence: uses specific moments from the novel and, where appropriate, outside examples
- Reasoning: explains how the evidence supports the claim
- Counterargument: acknowledges and responds to a reasonable opposing view
- Organization: presents ideas in a logical order with smooth transitions
A strong argument earns credit for how it is built, not for which side it lands on.
Stop spending your evenings grading essays
Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.
Try it free in secondsTeach the Counterargument Move
Many students skip the counterargument or tack on a weak one. Show them a simple pattern: state the opposing view fairly, then explain why your position still holds. A sample paragraph makes the move concrete.
When you grade, look for whether the opposing view is presented in a way its own supporters would accept. A straw man argument should not earn top marks. Feedback on this point often produces the biggest improvement.
Balance Opinion and Textual Evidence
Students may lean on personal stories or general statements about society. Those can be valuable, but the novel should remain central. Decide in advance how much outside evidence is allowed and state it in the assignment.
AI grading tools can check whether each body paragraph cites the text and flag those that do not. This makes it easier to spot essays that have drifted into pure opinion. You then decide how to respond.
Use the Debate to Build Listening Skills
A short in-class discussion before the writing helps students hear strong versions of the other side. Assign roles, then have them switch. Many come away with more balanced essays.
After grading, share a few anonymous excerpts that handle counterarguments well. Students see what is possible and often raise their own standards. The conversation continues long after the book is finished.
See how fast your grading workflow can be
Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.
Create free account