Scaffolding Argumentative Writing With Go Ask Alice as a Mentor Text

Published on September 23rd, 2026 by the GraideMind team

Using Go Ask Alice itself as a mentor text, meaning studying the author's or editor's own writing craft rather than only analyzing content and theme, offers an underused approach for teaching argumentative writing skills in a unit primarily focused on literary analysis. While the novel is not itself an argumentative text, its emotionally persuasive diary entries model many techniques, such as building toward a claim through accumulated evidence and specific detail, that transfer directly to teaching students how to construct their own persuasive and analytical arguments in a genuinely useful, concrete way.

A stack of exam papers waiting to be graded

A specific entry where the narrator builds toward a decision or realization through a sequence of smaller observations offers a useful model for teaching students how strong paragraphs accumulate evidence before arriving at a claim, rather than stating a claim first and then searching for supporting evidence after the fact. Walking students through this structure explicitly, identifying each smaller observation and how it contributes to the eventual larger point, gives them a concrete model they can adapt for their own argumentative paragraph writing, whether analyzing this novel or writing on an entirely different topic.

This kind of mentor text approach works particularly well for students who struggle with abstract writing instruction but respond more readily to concrete, imitable models drawn from a text they have already read and are genuinely engaged with. Rather than teaching paragraph structure through generic templates disconnected from any specific content, using the novel's own structural patterns as a model roots the instruction in material students already find meaningful, often increasing both comprehension and retention of the underlying writing skill being taught.

Identifying Mentor Passages for Specific Skills

Different passages throughout the novel can serve as mentor texts for different specific argumentative writing skills, and building a small collection of these passages before the unit begins gives a teacher a ready reference for targeted, in the moment instruction whenever a specific skill gap emerges in student writing. A passage demonstrating effective use of specific, sensory detail to support a broader claim about emotional state works well for teaching evidence selection, while a passage showing a shift in reasoning or self justification works well for teaching students how to acknowledge and address counterarguments within their own writing.

  • Select passages demonstrating accumulation of evidence toward a larger claim
  • Use specific entries to model effective integration of sensory and concrete detail
  • Identify moments of self justification as models for addressing counterarguments
  • Walk through mentor passages explicitly before asking students to imitate the technique
  • Connect each mentor text lesson directly to the skill needed for the culminating essay

Students learn to write persuasively faster from a model they can imitate than from a rule they must memorize.

Stop spending your evenings grading essays

Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.

Try it free in seconds

Structuring the Imitation Exercise

After analyzing a mentor passage explicitly as a class, a structured imitation exercise, asking students to write their own paragraph following the same underlying structure but applied to their own analytical argument about the novel, reinforces the pattern through direct practice rather than passive observation alone. This exercise works best as a low stakes, formative activity rather than a graded assignment, giving students freedom to experiment with the new structure without the pressure of a grade attached to their first attempt at applying an unfamiliar technique.

Sharing several student attempts at this imitation exercise with the class, discussing what worked well and what could be refined further, builds collective understanding of the technique while also normalizing the fact that imitating a new structure takes practice and rarely comes out perfectly on the first attempt. This kind of low stakes, collaborative practice tends to build genuine confidence before students are asked to apply the same technique independently within the higher stakes context of their formal, graded essay assignment.

Connecting Mentor Text Work to the Culminating Essay

The specific techniques practiced through mentor text imitation exercises should map directly onto skills required for the unit's culminating essay, ensuring students see the connection between this seemingly separate activity and the main writing task they will ultimately be evaluated on. Making this connection explicit, perhaps by referencing the specific mentor text lesson during essay drafting instruction, helps students recognize that the imitation practice was not a disconnected exercise but direct, purposeful preparation for the more demanding writing task still to come.

Teachers can further reinforce this connection by allowing students to reference their own imitation exercise drafts while writing their final essay, treating the earlier work as legitimate prewriting material rather than a discarded practice activity with no lasting value. This continuity between practice and final product respects students' time investment in the mentor text exercises and reinforces the broader lesson that strong writing develops through iterative practice and imitation of effective models, not through a single, isolated attempt at getting everything right immediately.

Assessing Growth From Mentor Text Instruction

Comparing a student's early imitation exercise attempts to their final essay writing provides a useful, concrete measure of skill growth over the course of the unit, giving both the teacher and the student visible evidence of development that a single final grade alone would not capture. This kind of before and after comparison can be a powerful tool for student self reflection, particularly for students who may not otherwise recognize how much their writing has genuinely improved over the relatively short span of a single unit.

Teachers who track this kind of growth systematically, perhaps through a simple portfolio approach collecting key writing samples across the unit, build a valuable record for parent conferences, student self assessment, and their own ongoing refinement of the mentor text approach itself. This portfolio evidence also provides concrete, specific support if grading decisions are ever questioned, since a teacher can point to clear, documented growth across the unit rather than relying solely on a single final essay grade as the entire basis for assessment.

See how fast your grading workflow can be

Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.

Create free account