Was Guitar Justified? Grading Argumentative Essays on Moral Choices in Song of Solomon
Published on September 20th, 2026 by the GraideMind team
Guitar Bains is one of the most debated characters in Song of Solomon, and his moral position gives students a serious argument to make. His commitment to the Seven Days grows out of real injustice, yet his methods and choices bring harm to people close to him. An essay on whether he is justified pushes students to weigh competing values.

Frame the assignment as a literary question about how the novel presents his choices. Students should analyze what the text invites readers to feel and think, not simply state their own moral views. That keeps the essay tied to the book.
Encourage them to consider Guitar's change over the course of the novel. His early friendship with Milkman, his growing fixation on the group's mission, and his eventual turn against his friend form an arc. Tracking that arc gives the essay structure and evidence.
Teach students to separate understanding from endorsement. A reader can explain why Guitar feels compelled to act without approving of what he does. Essays that manage this distinction show stronger reasoning.
Setting the ground rules
The subject involves violence and racial injustice, so discussion norms matter. Set expectations for respectful analysis before the assignment begins. Remind students that the goal is to interpret the novel with care.
- State a clear position on whether the novel presents Guitar's choices as justified, unjustified, or something more complicated
- Use evidence from early and late scenes to show how his motives and actions change
- Address the strongest opposing reading and respond to it with evidence
- Distinguish between the character's reasoning and the novel's overall perspective
- Maintain a respectful, analytical tone throughout the essay
A good moral argument about a character begins by taking the character's reasons seriously, even when the writer ends up rejecting them.
Stop spending your evenings grading essays
Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.
Try it free in secondsScoring the reasoning
Make it clear that the grade depends on the quality of the argument, not on the stance. A student who defends Guitar and a student who condemns him can both earn top marks with strong evidence. State this on the assignment sheet to reassure students.
Watch for essays that rely on personal opinion without textual support. A comment such as "Where does the novel show this?" pulls them back to the book. It also teaches the habit of grounding claims.
Encouraging nuance
The best essays hold multiple ideas at once. They might argue that the novel honors Guitar's anger while showing how it narrows his vision. Push students toward that kind of layered claim when they default to simple judgments.
Ask them to address what the novel suggests about the alternatives. Pilate's approach offers a contrast, and Milkman's choices raise their own questions. Considering those alternatives strengthens the analysis.
Keeping grading fair on a charged topic
Topics with moral weight can trigger grader bias. Working from a written rubric, and using a tool such as GraideMind to apply it evenly, reduces the risk that your own views color the scores. You still review the results, but the criteria remain steady.
Consider blind grading, where you cover names and score by rubric only. It takes a few extra minutes but improves fairness noticeably. Students also appreciate knowing the process is impartial.
See how fast your grading workflow can be
Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.
Create free account