Grading Gender Roles Essays on An Inspector Calls: What to Look For

Published on September 20th, 2026 by the GraideMind team

Essays on gender in An Inspector Calls can be some of the most interesting a class produces, and also some of the hardest to mark evenly. The play presents women in very different positions, and students bring their own views to the topic. A clear set of criteria helps keep the focus on the writing.

A stack of exam papers waiting to be graded

Three women drive the plot: Mrs. Birling, Sheila and Eva Smith. Each has a different relationship to power, and each is treated differently by the men around her. Students who see those contrasts tend to write stronger essays than those who treat women in the play as one group.

The assessment challenge is to reward analysis of how Priestley portrays gender, not simply the student's opinion about gender roles in general.

The points below give you a framework for doing that consistently.

The features of a strong response

Strong responses show how gender intersects with class. Eva Smith is vulnerable because she is a working-class woman with no protection, and Mrs. Birling's authority comes from her social standing rather than from her gender alone. Students who separate those factors are thinking carefully.

  • Compares how the three women are treated by the male characters
  • Explains how gender and class work together in Eva Smith's story
  • Notes how Sheila's independence grows during the evening
  • Considers how Mrs. Birling both uses and limits her position
  • Places the presentation of women in the context of the time the play was set and written

Gender essays improve when students describe the system, not just the people in it.

Stop spending your evenings grading essays

Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.

Try it free in seconds

Keeping opinion and analysis apart

Students sometimes write that women were treated badly in 1912 and stop there. That is a true statement, but it is not analysis of the play. A useful comment asks them to show where the text demonstrates it and what Priestley wants us to conclude.

Marking can feel more personal on this topic, so an explicit rubric matters. It gives you something concrete to point to when discussing a grade.

Prompts that improve the writing

Ask students to consider whether Priestley challenges gender expectations or simply exposes them. The question has no single correct answer, but it forces the student to make a decision and defend it.

You can also ask how the audience in 1945 might have viewed the women's roles, given the changes brought by wartime work. It is a good route into context.

Applying criteria evenly

Because this topic can produce strong personal responses, a shared rubric and a first pass from a tool like GraideMind can help keep marking even. The tool applies the same criteria to every script and drafts feedback tied to evidence and analysis, which leaves you free to read for insight.

The final mark stays with you. The benefit is a consistent baseline across every essay in the set.

See how fast your grading workflow can be

Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.

Create free account