Fixing Weak Conclusions in Student Essays About Poe
Published on October 13th, 2026 by the GraideMind team
The conclusion is often the weakest part of a student essay, and essays on Poe's "The Assignation" are no exception. Many end by restating the thesis in slightly different words and adding a vague line about how the story teaches us something about life. Teachers can transform these endings by explaining what a conclusion is supposed to accomplish.

A strong conclusion answers the question of why the argument matters. After spending several paragraphs analyzing the Stranger or the setting, the student should show what the analysis reveals about the story as a whole. This may involve connecting a specific insight to a larger idea or noting a complication that the essay has uncovered.
Students often fear introducing new ideas at the end and respond by simply repeating earlier points. It helps to distinguish between introducing a new argument, which is unwise, and extending an existing one, which is valuable. A conclusion can deepen the thesis without opening an entirely separate line of thought.
Recognize the Common Conclusion Mistakes
Certain mistakes recur across classes and are easy to spot once named. Some conclusions merely summarize, others make grand claims about humanity that the essay cannot support, and others trail off with a clichéd closing line. Giving these patterns labels helps students identify them in their own drafts.
- Restates the thesis and body points without adding anything new
- Makes sweeping claims about all people or all time
- Introduces an unrelated argument in the final lines
- Ends with a cliché about love, fate, or tragedy
- Fails to connect the argument back to a specific moment in the story
A conclusion should leave the reader understanding the story a little differently than before.
Stop spending your evenings grading essays
Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.
Try it free in secondsTeach the So What Question
One of the simplest tools is asking students to answer the question, so what, after their final body paragraph. If the Stranger's pride leads him into reckless action, why does that matter to our reading of the ending? Pushing students to answer this question produces conclusions with real substance.
Students can practice with a short exercise in which they write three possible final sentences and choose the strongest. Comparing options builds awareness of what makes a closing line effective. Many students find the process surprisingly enjoyable.
Grade Conclusions With Targeted Criteria
Rubric descriptors for conclusions should be specific, such as whether the ending extends the argument, avoids repetition, and remains connected to the text. A vague descriptor like "effective conclusion" invites inconsistent scoring. Observable criteria make grading faster and feedback clearer.
Because conclusions are short, teachers can read them in a separate pass and give brief, targeted comments. A single question, such as what this argument reveals about the story's ending, is often enough to spark revision. Students tend to respond well to this kind of prompt.
Make Feedback on Endings Scalable
Since weak conclusions follow predictable patterns, a small bank of comments can address most cases. Teachers can customize each comment with a reference to the student's actual closing sentence. This keeps feedback personal while saving time.
AI-assisted platforms such as GraideMind can identify conclusions that simply repeat the thesis and draft a revision prompt. The teacher reviews the suggestion and adapts it to the student. This approach brings consistent attention to a part of the essay that is often neglected.
See how fast your grading workflow can be
Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.
Create free account


