Cross-Curricular Units Using A Christmas Carol
Published on September 23rd, 2026 by the GraideMind team
"A Christmas Carol" is rich enough in historical and economic content that it lends itself naturally to cross-curricular planning, giving English and history or social studies departments a shared text to anchor coordinated units around Victorian England. Rather than teaching the novella purely as a literature assignment, coordinating with a history teacher covering the same historical period allows students to see the same content reinforced from two different disciplinary angles, which tends to deepen retention and understanding on both sides of the collaboration.

A history or social studies class studying the Industrial Revolution or Victorian England can use the novella as a primary-adjacent source, examining how a contemporary writer represented and critiqued the social conditions historians study more formally through documents, statistics, and policy analysis. Students reading Scrooge's dismissive attitude toward the poor alongside actual excerpts from the Poor Law Amendment Act, for instance, get to compare a fictional representation against the real policy language it was responding to, building genuine historical thinking skills alongside their literary analysis.
Economics classes, particularly at the high school level, can also draw on the novella when discussing historical economic theory, since Scrooge's "surplus population" comment directly references Malthusian economic thinking that was seriously debated in Dickens's time. Having students first encounter this idea through Scrooge's callous dialogue, then studying the actual economic theory it draws from, gives economics instruction a memorable, emotionally resonant entry point that a purely textbook-based introduction to historical economic theory often lacks.
Designing a Coordinated Unit
Building an effective cross-curricular unit around this novella requires genuine coordination between departments, ideally starting with a shared conversation about which specific historical or economic concepts each class will cover and when, so the two subjects reinforce rather than duplicate each other's content. A staggered schedule, where the history class covers the Poor Law and workhouse system shortly before the English class reaches the scenes referencing them, tends to produce the strongest results, since students arrive at the literary text with fresh, relevant background knowledge.
- English class reads the novella while history class covers Victorian poverty and the Poor Law
- A shared timeline assignment connecting specific novella scenes to real historical events or policies
- A joint discussion or debate comparing Dickens's fictional critique to actual historical arguments of the time
- An economics mini-lesson on Malthusian theory tied directly to Scrooge's "surplus population" line
- A shared final project asking students to connect the novella's argument to a specific historical document
A novel studied alongside its real historical context teaches both subjects more deeply than either could alone.
Stop spending your evenings grading essays
Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.
Try it free in secondsAssessment Strategies for Cross-Curricular Work
Assessing a cross-curricular unit well requires clarity about which skills belong to which discipline, even when the content overlaps significantly, so students understand what each class is actually evaluating in a shared project. An assignment asking students to connect a specific scene from the novella to a specific historical document might be graded by the English teacher for literary analysis and textual evidence, while the history teacher grades the same assignment for historical accuracy and appropriate use of primary source material.
A shared rubric, developed jointly by both departments before the unit begins, helps ensure this dual assessment stays consistent and fair rather than leaving students confused about conflicting expectations from two different teachers. Building this rubric together also forces useful conversations between departments about what each discipline actually values in student writing, conversations that often improve instruction in both subjects even beyond this specific collaborative unit.
Involving Additional Subjects
Beyond history and economics, this novella can support connections to other subjects with a bit more creativity, including music classes examining the novella's own musical structure as a "carol" divided into staves, or art classes examining Victorian illustration styles alongside the book's original engravings. Even a math class can find an entry point by examining historical wage and price data from Dickens's era, giving students concrete numbers to contextualize just how significant Bob Cratchit's modest salary actually was in relative terms.
These additional connections work best as optional enrichment rather than mandatory components of the core cross-curricular unit, since not every school will have the scheduling flexibility or staff interest to coordinate across four or five different subjects simultaneously. Even a two-subject collaboration between English and history, executed well, produces significant instructional value without requiring the more complex logistics of a full, school-wide interdisciplinary project.
Sustaining the Collaboration Across Years
Cross-curricular units require real upfront planning time, which makes it worth documenting the successful elements of a first attempt carefully so the collaboration becomes easier to repeat and refine in subsequent years rather than requiring a full redesign every time the novella comes back into rotation. Keeping shared materials, timelines, and rubrics in a common location accessible to both departments turns a single successful collaboration into a sustainable, recurring part of the curriculum rather than a one-time experiment.
Departments that sustain this kind of collaboration over several years often find that student engagement with both subjects improves measurably, since students begin to see the artificial boundaries between English and history as less rigid, recognizing that literature and historical events genuinely inform and illuminate each other. This shift in student perspective can be one of the more lasting benefits of a well-executed cross-curricular unit, extending well beyond the specific content of this single novella.
See how fast your grading workflow can be
Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.
Create free account