Bullying and Empathy Essays: Grading Student Writing About Janice Avery

Published on October 3rd, 2026 by the GraideMind team

Janice Avery, the seventh grade bully at Lark Creek Elementary, gives students one of the most useful discussion topics in Bridge to Terabithia. Leslie and Jess initially plan to get back at Janice, but a closer look at her home life changes how they see her. Essays on this storyline let students explore empathy, cruelty, and the way understanding complicates judgment.

A good prompt asks students to analyze rather than moralize. Instead of asking whether Janice is a bad person, a prompt might ask how the book changes the reader's view of her and what Paterson wants us to understand about bullying. This framing encourages evidence-based reasoning and avoids simplistic answers.

Because bullying is a real concern in schools, some students will write from personal experience. Teachers should be prepared for essays that reveal something about a student's own situation. The rubric can focus on the text while the teacher keeps an eye out for papers that need a caring response.

What Strong Responses Include

Strong essays trace the shift in how the characters see Janice. They might point to the moment Leslie learns that Janice is being mistreated at home and decides to leave an anonymous note, and they explain what that choice shows about empathy. They also recognize that understanding someone does not excuse harmful behavior.

  • A claim about how Janice's story changes the way characters respond to her
  • Evidence from the scene where the children learn about her circumstances
  • Explanation of how empathy differs from approval of bad behavior
  • Attention to Leslie's role in modeling compassion for Jess
  • A connection between the storyline and the novel's larger themes

Empathy essays are strongest when students can hold two ideas at once: that someone caused harm and that someone is hurting.

Stop spending your evenings grading essays

Let AI generate rubric-based feedback instantly, so you can focus on teaching instead.

Try it free in seconds

Feedback That Encourages Complex Thinking

Comments should push students beyond easy conclusions. A teacher might ask whether feeling sorry for Janice means the earlier bullying should be forgotten, inviting the student to think about accountability. This type of question builds ethical reasoning alongside literary analysis.

Teachers should also avoid imposing a single moral answer. Students may reach different conclusions about how far empathy should go, and their reasoning is what matters. Feedback should evaluate how well the argument is supported rather than whether it agrees with the teacher's view.

Handling Sensitive Disclosures

When a student describes being bullied, the grade becomes secondary. The teacher should follow school procedures for responding to potential bullying and offer support to the student. Having these steps decided in advance prevents delays and shows students that their experiences are taken seriously.

AI grading tools can help with scoring but should not be the only reader for essays on sensitive topics. A human review of flagged papers ensures that important disclosures are noticed. The combination of efficiency and human attention protects both the workflow and the students.

Extending the Learning Beyond the Essay

The essay can connect to classroom community building. Discussions about how to respond to unkindness, how to support peers, and how to recognize when someone is struggling build skills students need beyond the novel. Teachers can use themes from essays to start these conversations without calling out individual students.

Over time, the insights from this unit can influence classroom culture. Students who have thought carefully about Janice's story may be more attentive to the experiences of their peers. That is a valuable outcome that goes beyond any single grade.

See how fast your grading workflow can be

Most teachers go from hours per batch to minutes.

Create free account